The Nine Truths, Continued
Moving on to the third major point made in a very thorough article, first mentioned in the previous post, we need to understand that while an eating disorder may appear to be only a minor personality dysfunction, it might need to be looked at more closely. The issue could either already be — or could have the potential to blossom into — a serious health threat “the effects of which disrupt functioning beyond immediate complications of the eating disorder.”
Especially in uncertain times, it is important to understand that, treated or untreated, an eating disorder will be expensive. When people reach an age where reproductive health becomes an issue, more costs are involved, both financial and otherwise. Still, many negative outcomes can be avoided — which is why, for instance, Childhood Obesity News is interested in alerting parents and professionals to the potential benefits of Brainweighve, because, let’s face it, prevention is so much more efficacious than cure.
Did someone say “multifactorial”?
Truth #4 on the Academy for Eating Disorders list reminds us that no one chooses to suffer from an eating disorder. Even when they themselves may believe they volunteered for it and are consciously running the show, the problem is now understood to be basically organic.
In vulnerable individuals, biological drives towards automaticity can provoke rigid habits to the point where individuals struggle to regain control over their dysregulated eating and physical activity.
We are also reminded that the miraculous human mind can mess with its owner 24 hours a day for years without ever taking a vacation. Still, not everything operates in the psychiatrist’s realm. The authors here state that eating disorders, other habit-related malfunctions, and addiction all are generated by “some shared neurobiology.” Biologically and genetically influenced risk factors are associated with fundamental personality traits and cognitive styles.
Despite how sincerely they might believe they are the captains of their own fate, people affected by these problems are generally kidding themselves, and do not actually have a choice. They may need to pretend to themselves and others that it is all voluntary, because that is less frightening than to acknowledge that all semblance of control has been lost.
In diagnosing and treating these disorders, the authors mention underlying conditions as variations in individual neurobiology, such as “dysregulation in neurotransmitter availability and function.” In other words, an unrecognized factor or factors could be messing with the production of such essential substances as dopamine and serotonin. Here is the problem:
These systems are central in rewarding aspects of food, motivation, executive functions, and the regulation of mood, satiety, and impulse control.
There are differences between people who suffer from active eating disorders, and those who do not. Brain anatomy might be a factor, and so might various aspects of the brain’s operation, affecting emotional processing and cognition, among other functions. This applies especially to teens because:
A maturing brain may be particularly vulnerable to the insults caused by extreme food restriction or excessive exercise resulting in negative energy balance or highly variable energy consumption (binge-fast cycles).
The intellectual workers in this field are comfortable with the idea that the tendency toward eating disorders is biologically influenced, because in animal research subjects it is so obvious. Sure, humans are more complicated than lab rats, but sometimes not by much. Throughout the kingdom of warm-blooded creatures, brain structure and function are responsible for “biologically-driven maintenance patterns that impede recovery.”
Your responses and feedback are welcome!
Source: “The Science Behind the Academy for Eating Disorders’ Nine Truths About Eating Disorders,” NIH.gov, October 2017
Image by actaylorjr-6170605/Pixabay